Mark Delany wrote:
> Charles Lindsey wrote:
>
>> Now apply simple canonicalization to all those cases, using:
>>
>> "In more formal terms, the "simple" body canonicalization algorithm
>> converts "0*CRLF" at the end of the body to a single "CRLF"."
>>
>> Making the entirely reasonable assumption that "body" means exactly
>> what RFC 2822 defines it to mean, then here is what gets hashed in all
>> of those cases:
>>
>
> (Did you mean to include Last-Header: in the following examples?)
Mark, Charles was intending to show the last header of the message and
the separating CRLF between it and the body. He's trying to nail down
the semantics of applying simple to the body alone, so wants to be clear
about which CRLF belongs to the header, which CRLF belongs to the
separator, and which CRLFs belong to the body. So the body in each
example would NOT include the octets "Last-Header: foobarCRLF".
Tony Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
