Yes, see my other note that crossed in the mail. I left off a sentence.
And "last line of the body" is definitely more correct.
Tony
Charles Lindsey wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 04:50:07 -0000, Tony Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Point 7:
>> Another way of expressing this algorithm that people may find
>> easier to understand is:
>>
>> "If the last line of the message does not end with CRLF, CRLF is
>> added. Then, CRLF 0*CRLF is reduced to a single CRLF."
>
> Well that would be better expressed as "1*CRLF is reduced to a single
> CRLF",
> but you should be saying "If the last line of the body" rather than "If
> the last line of the message", because
>
> ------------------
> Last-Header: foobarCRLF
> CRLF
> ------------------
>
> is a message with an empty body (read RFC 2822).
>
> Or put it another way; the last line of what you hash MUST NEVER be
> empty (i.e. must never consist of CRLF with no preceding real text).
>
> That was why I included my INFORMATIVE NOTE, just to remove any possible
> misinteroretations (and we have just seen how easily people misinterpret
> things :-( ).
>
> --Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own
> thing------------------------
>
> Tel: +44 161 436 6131
> Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
>
> PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB
> A5
>
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE WELL: This list operates according
> tohttp://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
