> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Crocker > > Stephen Farrell wrote: > >> If anything, change this text: > ... > > > > I think we need some text containing no MUST/SHOULD/MAY at all, > > The current text was the result of significant discussion and > a rather careful effort to focus on the primary concern. > > Take out the normative quality to the text and you lose the > real stricture that was the entire intent we chose. > > Turn the MUST to a MAY has you reverse the agreement that was > developed about that concern.
That is a meta-argument. At this point we have a last-call objection to close. 'We decided differently' is not a valid move in a last call discussion. If the point was argued and consensus reached there should be someone who can give a rationale for MUST NOT as opposed to SHOULD NOT. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
