On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:18:32 -0800 Douglas Otis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >DKIM's restrictions on linking signatures with a header was premised >upon an expectation that visual examination of headers provided a >means for recognition.
Would you please point me to a reference for this statement? I recall saying 2822.From should be signed because it's a mandatory element of an e-mail message. You seem to remember a different WG discussion than I do. Scott K _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
