> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arvel Hathcock
> I have had some sympathy for this in the past but now I have > to ask: Are we creating "Sender *SIGNING* Practices" or > "Sender Practices In General"? Besides, there are already at > least two other ways with more traction to achieve this > particular goal. This is a subtly different issue. The charter only allows us to actualy specify "Sender *SIGNING* Practices" but that does not mean that we can't provide a framework that is capable of expressing "Sender Practices In General". My position is that we should not address this until after we recharter. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
