> From: John Levine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> No, I was arguing that a sender's opinion about the relative > merits of algorithms is useless to a receiver, so there is no > point in publishing it. Wietse summarized the reasonable > approach to verifying signatures well enough that I won't try > and do so again. True, but not what is being proposed. What is at issue is not what the sender thinkg of the algorithm. All that is at issue is describing what they do _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
