On Wednesday 30 May 2007 18:22, Jim Fenton wrote: > (2) SSP record type (TXT vs. something new). Only 4 messages in discussion, > mostly saying "if you support TXT, don't bother with anything else." > Again, no clear consensus.
Agreed. There is also a view that if you go with a new RR type, don't bother with SSP. By the time a new RR type is widely deployable, the market will have found a different solution. Scott K _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
