I find the argument from Microsoft where they showed the code for their DNS server and in particular the switch statement saving the file data somewhat more convincing.
What they mean is that they can coax the server to emit the desired bit sequences under certain conditions, not that it is a configuration they would personally accept. In other words it is administration advice from Linux geeks directed at Windows network admins. It's a bit like taking advice on how to mix a Manhattan from the Temperance Union. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eliot Lear > Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2007 9:51 AM > To: Hector Santos > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP issues > > Hi Hector, > > How will my Mr. Koch assure the world that new RR record > queries will > > be reliable? that all new RR queries will be expected to be passed > > thru recursive queries by heterogeneous DNS servers? > > I don't know, but since he's made a forceful argument in the > past on the subject I figure we would do well to not imagine > his answer ;-) _______________________________________________ > NOTE WELL: This list operates according to > http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html > _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
