> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen Farrell
> > I don't want to have an arguement. Stats are hard to come > by and I'm > > genuinely curious. Offlist is fine. > > Offlist is better since this is off topic. > > We already decided NOT to include a requirement that SSP be > able to express the "nomail" practice. Let's spend the time > elsewhere, where we have issues to decide. NOMAIL is out of scope, but wildcard is in scope. The relevance here is that it looks like we can get 95% or better coverage of the real use cases here by acknowledging that wildcards are primarily an issue for NOMAIL. Incidentally any DNS lookup is going to load the root zone. SenderID/SPF may be the interim solution here. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
