> Let's try get back to Jim's issues. What we need to do is > help get ssp-00 out so that we have an I-D as a basis for discussion.
> (1) Use of XPTR records for SSP. The idea here is to create > a more general policy mechanism that can be used by WS-* and > such. There were about 20 messages discussing this from 5 > people. I'm not reading a clear consensus on this. > > Issue#1: +1 - include use of XPTR as part of ssp-00 > Issue#1: -1 - exclude use of XPTR from ssp-00 +1 > (2) SSP record type (TXT vs. something new). Only 4 messages > in discussion, mostly saying "if you support TXT, don't > bother with anything else." Again, no clear consensus. > > Issue#2: +1 - Define how to use a TXT RR for SSP policies (with or > without something else) > Issue#2: -1 - Don't use TXT at all, only use new RRs for SSP +1 > (3) Upward query vs. wildcard publication. 27 messages in > discussion from 15 people. Most of the discussion was a > rehash of the idea of associating semantics with DNS > zone-cuts, which we had already discussed and rejected. I > have also been trying to get an opinion from DNSOP on the > idea of a one-level upward search (which I think solves 90% > of the problem), but haven't gotten any response. > > Issue#3: +1 - Define an upward query based approach to finding SSP > statements > Issue#3: -1 - Define a wildcard based approach to finding SSP > statemetns -1 _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
