>Would it help the discussion if large deployers of DKIM expressed their >opinions on nomail? (Again, they could express their opinions and this >item could still be held for later.)
If nomail is indeed the most useful SSP-ish assertion, which I agree it is, it might make sense for people who care about it to go work on moving MX . (or some other pure nomail approach) along the standards track rather than getting entangled in SSP. One killer problem of putting nomail into SSP is that if example.com publishes a nomail SSP, and sends signed mail, there is no agreement at all here on which one you believe. R's, John _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
