Arvel Hathcock wrote: > Just one suggestion. I would rewrite the second sentence like this: > > "This practice would be used by those domains who wish to emphasize > security over deliverability of their messages." > > and leave out the bit about what we think the typical use case for > this might be. In fact, since none of the other practice options > provide a rational behind why they would be used I don't see the need > to do so here either in which case the entire sentence could be > removed. Or perhaps a NON-NORMATIVE DISCUSSION section could be added > where the possible use cases and cautions could be given.
I agree; I'm inclined to go with including it as a non-normative discussion because I consider it important to describe the use case that motivates the use of that practice. -Jim _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
