On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:03:00 +0000
From: Stephen Farrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 07:23:45 -0800 "Hallam-Baker, Phillip"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am happy to say that DKIM MUST support the use of ARF as A reporting
format
Is this format standardized or does it at least have a stable specification
somewhere?
I think someone posted a link a few messages back.
My question on this is whether it'd really be needed now, as a part
of SSP, or whether it'd be ok to have it as an extension, defined
separately (I'm thinking of the milestones in our charter).
If the latter, then a personal I-D would be the place to start
and the WG can consider that when we see it.
[...]
In progress. Too late for the IETF -00 draft cutoff, but I can post it to
the list when it's ready.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
