On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 01:41:27 -0000, Hector Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi Jim,
+1, I think the paragraphs are well enough stated.
I think "forgery" is broad enough. If anything maybe change it to:
How about s/forgery/malpractice/?
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131
Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
