Looks good to me.  I'll volunteer to give a short update on SSP changes
since the last draft.  I don't think we need to totally rehash SSP,
since we have been talking about it for several WG meetings now.

-Jim

Stephen Farrell wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Sorry for the late agenda.
>
> Feel free to ping Barry or I for changes.
>
> IETF-70 DKIM meeting agenda
>
> Tuesday 1520-1720, Salon 1.
>
> The main goal of the meeting should be to try get SSP ready for
> WGLC starting at/after the meeting.
>
> 0. Agenda bash (5)
> 1. WG and document status (5)
> 2. http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dkim/draft-ietf-dkim-ssp/ (30)
> 3. http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dkim/draft-ietf-dkim-overview/ (15)
> 4. http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dkim/draft-ietf-dkim-deployment/ (15)
> 5. http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dkim/draft-otis-dkim-tpa-ssp-02.txt (10)
> 6. AOB (plenty)
>
> Regards,
> Stephen.
>
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
>
>   
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

Reply via email to