I'd like to reiterate something we (chairs and Eliot, our patient issue tracker manager) said a few times at the WG meeting today.
If you want to make a comment on the SSP I-D that you hope the WG will process in order to arrive at rough consensus then please follow the rules. [1] Essentially, that means start a new thread for each topic, and put NEW ISSUE in the subject line, and, since SSP is about to enter WGLC, please propose concrete changes, to the extent possible. If you want help to breakdown more general concern feel free to ping me offlist (or nab me here in Vancouver during the week) and I'll be glad to try assist. Secondly, lets try to avoid recycling old discussions. The baseline for our WGLC on SSP is RFC 5016, and so deviations away from that (whether additions or deletions) each need separate additional justification. Stephen. [1] http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/2006q1/001880.html _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
