>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >DKIM-Signature: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >Subject: phish is yummy > >If you're going to say that this signature qualifies as acceptable for >the above SSP record, then you have created a security hole that renders >SSP utterly useless.
It rather depends on my opinion of hacker.com. I agree that signatures from unknown domains are uninteresting, something that's the same with or without SSP. But if I have reason to trust hacker.com, I'm done, I'm not going to check anything else. R's, John _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
