On Monday 10 December 2007 11:46, Stephen Farrell wrote: > Scott Kitterman wrote: > > I've got 33 messages from one participant in the last two days and I find > > nothing novel or constructive in them in my personal opinion. Such > > actions are (once again in my personal opinion which may well be wrong) > > nothing more than a denial of service attack on this working group. > > FWIW, I don't agree that this is just a DoS. At least some of the > issues raised haven't gotten much consideration over the last few > months and if we do want to produce a standards track SSP then we > need to do that level of review.
Sure. I have my opinion and you're certainly entitled to yours. As I've said previously, I have neither the time nor the energy to sort through all the chaff to see if or what bits of wheat are there. To the extent I understand his flurry of comments I think they are largely based on a lack of recollection of what the WG has been through already or a fundamental misunderstanding of SSP. I don't think it's my job to fix either of those. > Let's all stop speculating as to motives. > > S. Done. Good luck getting through this. Scott K _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
