Such complaints would naturally be offlist from non or part time participants at industry meetings, commercial contacts and other venues Thanks,
Bill Oxley Messaging Engineer Cox Communications -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Kitterman Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 12:46 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Processing SSP issues inJanuary using jabber/concalls.... On Tuesday 11 December 2007 12:35, Dave Crocker wrote: > Stephen Farrell wrote: > >> Who is the 'everyone' that you are relying on to vet the decision to do > >> a variance? > > > > I'm assuming the people subscribed here and the ADs. > > For a working group that has repeatedly received complaints about being > exclusive, it would make sense to be particularly careful to follow > procedures that encourage participation. Sufficient advanced notice seems > a natural part of that. > > d/ I'm not aware of any such complaints. Would you please provide references for this assertion? Scott K _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
