Michael Thomas wrote: > My position is that these new dispositions directives should be > removed, and that the discussion of sender desire should be moved to > non-normative discussion in the practices (eg, "strict").
That seems like a potential compromise, but I'd still rather see sender desires left to best practices documents and blogs instead of technical standards. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
