Jon Callas wrote: > I offer as a suggestion that we issue an SSP document that describes > only the basic broken-signature-only model of SSP with only the one > policy (sign-all). After that, we look at enhancements to the model > carefully. We seriously discuss whether they are outside the charter > because of the effect it has on the global email infrastructure to > turn DKIM from an opt-in protocol to a you-must protocol. We also > seriously have to look at other policies to discuss their > effectiveness along with their environmental effects.
+1 This will let us experiment and learn through real-world operational experience, rather than continually rehashing the same arguments. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
