-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
>
> The comment you quote expresses rather a different concern: that the
> additional traffic associated with lookup of messages with a valid
> signature which is not an Originator Signature will be excessively
> burdensome. Can you explain what will lead to the generation of large
> volumes of mail signed by other than the Originating Domain? Even so,
> we're only talking about 3 lookups maximum.
>
> There are currently quite a number of queries that will almost always
> fail for a significant number of years into the future: AAAA queries.
> This isn't meant as a criticism of IPv6 deployment, but I haven't
> heard
> that DNS is melting down as a result, either.
>
I agree with you, Jim. I don't think it's going to be an issue. But
the fact that the analysis will be easy and affirmative doesn't mean
we don't have to do it.
Jon
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Universal 2.6.3
Charset: US-ASCII
wj8DBQFHYKjjsTedWZOD3gYRApiXAKCbnDLXRdjzR5Cb0PfYCG9FdEEubACfScej
LFsDaqsoSrjijBNm9J0y+qc=
=angS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
