> I don't think SSP is hostile to the DKIM deployment, but helps its
> deployment because it will at least provide some avenue of protection
> for domains and receivers who don't wish to get into 3rd Party Trust
> Service dependencies where there is no standard definition and
> absolutely no guarantee of consistent results.
By the way, speaking of trust and reputation services:
SSP does not say that my bank's domain belongs to a real bank.
SSP does not say that a criminal's domain belongs to a fake bank.
SSP does not help me decide which bank is real.
If anything requires a reputation service, then it is SSP not DKIM.
DKIM can manage just fine with a local whitelist.
I am aware that credibility on this list is inversely proportional
to the number of messages posted, and I will post corrections like
this infrequently.
Wietse
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
