Stephen Farrell wrote: > Can you check that these seem ok, or comment where they don't?
Do you have <http://article.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.dkim/8533/> ? I don't see it, disussed deep within some monster-threads, but the report was fairly clear: | Subject: NEW ISSUE: remove [FWS] (was: SSP Issues list) | Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:25:24 +0100 [...] | Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [...] | Stephen Farrell wrote: | | > If anyone else has any SSP issues they'd like to | > raise, now would be a good time. | | [FWS] within DNS records is just wrong. | | Frank _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
