> I fail to see why we should create an RFC only working for PayPal & > Co. - especially while they are still too timid to use FAIL in their > SPF or PRA policies. SSP "first author" > would be far more restrictive than anything SPF or PRA do.
It's very interesting that while PayPal may be "too timid to use FAIL in their SPF or PRA policies," they /have/ -- with much public fanfare -- made deals with Yahoo! and other ISPs to reject any messages that can't be verified with DomainKeys or DKIM. There'll surely be more of these 1:1 agreements, while we wait for SSP to become useful. If we wait long enough, SSP won't even be necessary for the big, high-value signers & verifiers. -- J.D. Falk Receiver Products Return Path _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
