John Levine wrote: > Trying to forbid random other third party signatures is, as I expect > you'd agree, just silly.
And yet, treating any random third party signature as if it's just as valid as a first party signature is, as I expect you'd agree, the kind of security issue that would cause someone to stand up on a chair and shout "DKIM will never be useful for anything, and you people all suck toads!" Yet another reason to leave 3rd party signatures (and toad-sucking) out of scope, I suppose. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
