At 09:14 24-02-2008, Hector Santos wrote: >Pray tell, are you aware this tells the MTA who are processing the >payload at the SMTP DATA state (not POST SMTP), to issue a 250 >positive message accept response code with the true purpose of >silently discarding it?
Yes. >So its more of a At 09:23 24-02-2008, Hector Santos wrote: > PUBLIC ACCEPT notification > PRIVATE DISCARDING OF MAIL (no notification) >operational behavior? Yes. >Of course, this would also conflict the current direction of MTA of >doing more dynamic SMTP level analysis of mail by mandating a >DKIM/ASP design of delaying the payload analysis to POST SMTP. If you mean DKIM/ASP verification, that can be done during the SMTP session. Regards, -sm _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
