> There was supposed to be a poll, can we please start > that now ? Or roll a dice for ASP, ADSP, SPAD.
<chair> You'll recall, perhaps, that Stephen said we'd discuss it until the 19th (that's tomorrow), and then take a poll. So far, from the discussion, I see overwhelming support for "ADSP" (and I'm soooo saaaaad that you folks didn't eat up my "FroDo" idea (which DC and I both claim, so we can have a pub fight in Dublin about that)). </chair> <chair> To Mike Thomas's concern: I'm sympathetic to the desire not to "keep" changing it, and I note that the proposal is that if we decide to change it, it will be the last change. </chair> <participant> We should consider, in our last day before the poll, whether to de-couple the DNS name from the document name. Perhaps a final change of the DNS name to, say, _SigningPractice would be suitable, and that would insulate us from any changes to the document. </participant> <chair> During the discussion of Mike's concern, there were a few messages that were unnecessarily combative (on both sides of the discussion). It's my declaration that that has stopped now. It's my hope that that won't happen again. I don't have time to watch this mailing list on a minute-to-minute basis, but I will get back to you if I see that sort of thing cropping up again. We remain polite and respectful here. We WILL start pursuing process-related remedies if things get nasty. Please do remain respectful -- we all have a lot of work to do, and we all get a bit chafed sometimes. </chair> Poll starts tomorrow. Barry _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
