6 days with no follow-up, so.... Jim Fenton said the following: > Steve, thank you for refreshing my memory on this. I would state it a > little differently now since SSP doesn't really have a "comply", that an > unsigned message from the domain bar.baz.ebay.com will be considered to > have an "Unknown" ASP unless... > > So yes, it is important that we keep this.
Dave, does this satisfy you? Does anyone else have an issue with retaining step 2? I'm looking for consensus to close issue 1535 and leave the spec as it is, with step 2 in there.... Barry (as WG chair) _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
