John Levine wrote: >> I object to FroDo as a potential and unnecessary trademark issue with >> parties that have a history of litigation and indeed are currently in >> litigation between themselves. > > You may be confusing trademark and copyright.
Besides that, why should we worry about colliding a name with a C64 emulator? <http://frodo.cebix.net/>. Nevermind, that collision requires functional overlap. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
