Eric, Thanks for noting this. The details in that portion of the draft are painfully vestigal and needs to solidly embrace the trust arena of an ADMD, rather than just focus on particular modules within the ADMD.
d/ Eric Allman wrote: > In reviewing the documents prior to the meeting today, I noticed an > oddity in draft-ietf-dkim-overview-09. The intro to section 5 says > "The MSA signs the message..." and "The MDA verifies the > signature...". However, this isn't necessarily true, and in fact > conflicts with 3.1.2 (Implementation Locality), 5.2 (Signing), 5.3 > (Verifying), and 5.6 (DKIM Placement within an ADMD). > > If those words are intended to be relative to just the DKIM service > then I suggest other wording such as "DKIM Signing Agent (DSA)" and > "DKIM Verification Agent (DVA)". > > eric > _______________________________________________ > NOTE WELL: This list operates according to > http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html > -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
