Jim Fenton wrote:
>>> The last paragraph also suggests the use of different sub-domains for 
>>> d=, but does not point out that the author address must also follow 
>>> suit, otherwise the message may not be seen to be in compliance with 
>>> Signing Policy.
>> I don't understand.  What is there in the DKIM signing protocol that 
>> requires the author adress to "follow suit"?
>>
> Not in the signing protocol, but in ADSP.  If an email with a From 
> address of, say, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is signed with 
> d=transaction.example.com then the signature cannot be an Author Signature.

I thought we had agreed to defer having the Overview document talk abut the 
Signing Practices material until it is standardized?


d/
-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

Reply via email to