Frank Ellermann wrote: > Identifying TXT records by initial "tags" such as "v=spf1" is easy > as long as the desired TXT record has an unambiguous version tag. > > The various ADSP drafts fail to provide the essential version tag > for their identification, this is no general TXT wildcard problem. > > The general TXT problem is the *size* of all RXT records combined, > and the various ADSP drafts refuse to share SPF records for their > limited size needs. >
While I myself am leaning away from TXT records for other reasons, this is not one of them. ADSP is a bit more safe because like DKIM it uses a _adsp label. If you look up a TXT record with that label it makes less sense to expect anything other than ADSP. Eliot _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
