On Tue, 3 Jun 2008, Tony Hansen wrote: > Right now, I'm leaning towards thinking that #2 is correct. What say the > rest of you?
Discarding FWS and tokenizing is probably a common implementation tactic, which favours #2. I'm inclined to say it's an errata issue (and would offer #2 as the preferred implementation) unless someone can show precedent for resolution of something similar in the past. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
