I can't find the term "intermediary" or "end system" anywhere in ssp-04, and the term third-party occurs only in section A.4 and the table of contents for A.4. There is also no section 3.1.2
Is the text being objected to in this issue still present in the document? I do think it's important to make it clear that non-Author signatures are not inherently worthless, just out of scope for this draft. I believe that point is made at least partially in section A.4. Ellen > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ietf-dkim- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen Farrell > Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 9:53 AM > To: ietf-dkim > Subject: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1554: Third parties in "overview" > > > Issue description: https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1554 > > Thread: http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/2008q1/009690.html > > I didn't see a clear consensus on what to do for this. Since > the change calls for adding additional explanation in an area > where (it seems from the list) we're not clear on what terms > to use in such additional text, I think in the absence of > further discussion the best thing might be to close this one. > > If no-one objects, I'll ask Eliot to close this on July 11th. > > S. > > _______________________________________________ > NOTE WELL: This list operates according to > http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
