On 10/07/2008 08:53, "Siegel, Ellen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know we're trying to avoid new issues, but I think we need some > clarifications/extensions to the usage examples in Appendix A. > > 1) In A.1, make the list of "other paths" more complete. In particular, > add participation in mailing lists, and sending mail from external email > clients: > > "...Such paths could include MTAs at hotels or hotspot networks used by > traveling users, web sites that provide "mail an article" features, user > participation in mailing lists, or use of 3rd party mail clients that > support multiple user identities." +1 > 2) Add an example for dkim=unknown (or no record). All of the existing > examples are for the use of "all" or "discardable". We need a clear > example of where this is not a good idea, where a domain should publish > "unknown" (or not publish at all). > > Add new section: > A.6 Domains with Independent Users and Liberal Use Policies > When a domain has independent users and its usage policy does not > explicitly restrict them to sending mail only from designated in-house > mail servers (e.g. many ISP domains and even some corporate domains), > then it is only appropriate to publish an ADSP record containing > "unknown". Publishing either "all" or "discardable" will likely result > in significant breakage because independent users are likely to send > mail from the external paths enumerated in section A.1. Not sure about the wording, but +1 to the need for a statement along these lines. -- J.D. Falk Return Path Work with me! http://www.returnpath.net/careers/
_______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
