Jim Fenton wrote:
>> Close the ticket as soon as *FWS is replaced by either
>> *WSP or [FWS].
> Well, OK, but I'll point out that when the ticket was
> opened, the text said [FWS].
Yes, and the submitter of this ticket found that there
are far worse things than [FWS] when he saw the *FWS ;-)
Apparently folks agree that [FWS] in DNS is nonsense, but
in line with RFC 4871: Ordre, contreordre, désordre.
Frank
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
