since in its current very limited form I have no opinion on usefulness so therefore no objection
Bill Oxley Messaging Engineer Cox Communications, Inc 404-847-6397 -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Dave CROCKER Sent: Sat 9/20/2008 8:06 AM To: DKIM List Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Progressing ADSP (Was: Re: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-06 (fwd)) Stephen Farrell wrote: > It might be no harm if folks who do think ADSP should > go ahead would respond to this saying so. +1 d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
