On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 02:20:18PM +0200, [email protected] wrote: >Section 3.2: >> o If a message has a Valid Signature from an Author Domain, ADSP >> provides no benefit relative to that domain since the message is >> already known to be compliant with any possible ADSP for that >> domain. > >"If a message has an Author Signature, ..."?
It would still need to be valid unless it is clear in the document that all Author Signatures are valid. Seems to be safer to specify "valid" to me... >Section 3.2: >> o If a message has a Valid Signature from a domain other than an >> Author Domain, the receiver can use both the Signature and the >> ADSP result in its evaluation of the message. > >"If a message has a Valid Signature that from a domain other than an >Author Domain, or a Valid Signature from an Author Domain that does >not meet the requirements of Author Signature, .."? I apologize for not re-reading all of the ADSP document, but I think we have to remember that a message can have multiple DKIM signatures. Perhaps that is what section 3.2 is trying to address? -- Jeff Macdonald [email protected] _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
