John Levine wrote: > Except that the UAID might or might not be an e-mail address. The one > on this messgage isn't.
So, for clarity, can you (or someone) call out what you think is the impact, if any, for ADSP, caused by this proposed change to 4871. Thanks, Stephen. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
