Mike Adkins had an interesting suggestion where he'd use d=aol.com to sign outbound messages, and [email protected], [email protected] and [email protected] to denote various reputation scores that aol's filters assigned an outbound message.
This would allow aol to separate mail into different streams at their end, and it'd allow receiving ISPs aware of this i= classification to specialcase their filters to watch for i=bad or i=suspect email from aol. That's just one use case .. it is not just senders wanting a separate reputation for all their clients so that some bad clients dont harm the rest of their client base. Even in the AOL scenario.. ADSP would be a nonstarter, thank god. On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 4:20 AM, Tony Hansen <[email protected]> wrote: > The only one of interest I've seen suggested so far was if the i= value > was identical to the users' email addresses. But I could potentially see > other possible values for the 2nd area of interest. Another way to frame > the 2nd area of interest is: what type of namespace does the signer use, > if they care to identify it? _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
