On 2/12/09 7:31 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote: > > > Eliot Lear wrote: >> You've seen several votes for the alternate, but in any case Jim has >> offered alternate language, which i am inclined to accept. I would >> be happy to proceed, however, with a poll on the process, if you >> would like. > > > 1. Jim sent the only posting that I read as simple, direct support.
And Murray also indicated support, at least in part, but had questions about whether I felt it was appropriate to address your core concern about having a single gazzouta, and wanted an answer, which I gave. > > 2. My request was for +1/-1 postings on > draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-02, not a request for a multi-stage > sequence starting with meta-questions about process. Yes, and I would prefer the multi-stage approach, because I consider draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-02 to be excessive to the problem at hand, lacking consideration for the appropriate tradeoffs on readability. Eliot _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
