At 16:38 18-02-2009, John Levine wrote: >I've been collecting the DKIM signatures on my incoming mail, and >I'm surprised how few of them have i= at all. Ignoring my own
As I mentioned previously, there are some DKIM signers using i=. Usually, it is when the domain part of the address is a subdomain. >By far the largest stream of DKIM signed mail is from gmail which >doesn't use i=. There is a problem with their interpretation of a DKIM signed mail when the i= is set. Regards, -sm _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
