On the lines of "v=spf1 -all" or example.com. IN MX 0 . (mark delany's old mxzerodot proposal)?
Yes a null signature could probably do it but something more explicit perhaps to signal that this is not simply breakage? On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Hector Santos <[email protected]> wrote: > What is the current recommended method to establish or expose that a > DOMAIN should not be signed, is not expected to be signed and that any > DKIM supportive receiver seeing a message with a signature from a > purported domain should be rejected with full confidence? > > Will a NULL public key do the trick? > > Thanks > > -- > Sincerely > > Hector Santos > http://www.santronics.com > > > _______________________________________________ > NOTE WELL: This list operates according to > http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html > -- Suresh Ramasubramanian ([email protected]) _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
