Jim Fenton wrote:
> The text you cite specifies a single purpose. It says nothing about
> there being a single output value.
Jim,
"permitting a signing domain to claim responsibility"
and
"DKIM separates the question of the identity of the signer of the message
from the purported author of the message. In particular, a signature includes
the identity of the signer."
do specify a single output value, because "a signing domain" and "the identity
of the signer" do not simply state a purpose; they state and constrain a
function.
Please start by considering the use of "a" and its definition.
> In the context of the ADSP draft, you have said that text in the draft
> (which has been through WG and IETF last call) doesn't necessarily mean
> that there was WG consensus, unless there had also been substantial
> mailing list discussion on the topic. Now you're saying that text in
> the document is evidence of WG consensus.
>
> You can't have it both ways.
Care to cite the specific postings that you are suggesting provide some sort of
contradictory statements?
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
