On 9 Mar 2009, at 22:47, SM <[email protected]> wrote:
> At 14:17 09-03-2009, John Levine wrote: >> I sign all my mail, but there's no way I can say that with ADSP. In >> its current form, ADSP is broken and useless. > > Given that one of the authors of draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-09 states that > ADSP is broken and useless, is it worth publishing it on the > Standards Track or even asking for publication? Firstly, we're not authors in the sense of being personally responsible for each word - the ability and willingness to write something with which you disagree is laudable in many cases and in this case. Secondly, I don't think anyone would accuse John of a chronic tendency to understatement. So, no I don't believe his statement has any such implication, S. > > > Regards, > -sm > > _______________________________________________ > NOTE WELL: This list operates according to > http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
