You have suggested that many times. The WG and the BoFs before it always disagreed. End of story as far as I'm concerned unless *many* of those that want it as standards-track now indicate a change of mind.
Again, please stop. This is unproductive and totally distracting the WG from progressing with the 4871 errata, Stephen. John Levine wrote: >> Please stop all this ADSP "good"/ADSP "bad" repetition. > > I am specifically proposing that we withdraw it as > standards track and resubmit it as experimental, > because that's what it is. > > R's, > John > _______________________________________________ > NOTE WELL: This list operates according to > http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html > _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
