> I can do that, but it will probably take a few days. But for > clarification, is the new terminology cast in stone? I have a > particular problem with the term "User Agent Identifier (UAID)" because > it doesn't necessarily represent a user agent -- it could, for example, > represent a mailing list manager. I greatly prefer the term "signing > identifier" (which replaces signing identity) because it covers the > range of use cases more completely.
I'd say it's a fair proposal, and we'll see where it goes. What I meant was that, for example, it won't work to propose text changes that roll back the terminology changes altogether. Or something like that. A proposed change with a reason behind it gives everyone something to work with and to decide, one way or t'other. Barry _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
