MH Michael Hammer (5304) wrote:
>> If nothing else, this would make revocation sort of... bizarre
>> and unpredictable. The implication is that I'd have to send $you
>> mail (for $you == 'universe') to get you to nuke my record in your
>> database. Of course every good protocol becomes a control protocol
>> for others, but still this seems a little whacked even by that
>> standard :)
>>
>> Mike
>
>
> Well, I suppose we could always include a TTL in the tag <G>.
Yes, but then you'd have to continuously deal with domains that you
send to TTL+dt being unprotected, which would be pretty easy
for an attacker to exploit. The implications of policy+push is
flood fill. Not a happy implication, IMO.
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
