Steve Atkins wrote: > It's the existence of it that's a bad idea. The sole redeeming feature > is that it's optional, and so receivers can treat any signature with l= > as invalid, with no risk of affecting mail sent by competent senders.
Not according to the Crocker-Levine axis. All your decisions are
belong to them.
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
